It's made the press again -in fact it's made a lot of press. I was referred to the Business Day report by Robert Simmonds. This report concentrated on the beneficiaries, 20% of whom are SAB's lower paid white employees. And once again Mr Obvious (one Ajay Lalu) is asked for his opinion - to which he replies “Unfortunately, according to the codes of good practice, white beneficiaries don’t qualify,” Er....... tell us something we don't know Ajay. So what if they don't get any points for this deal - what SAB hopes to achieve is the financial independence of their staff and sundry other players.
And then not to be outdone ol' Aj "criticised the fact that there was no guarantee on the value of the stakes at the end of the 10-year lock-in period." He might have been taken a bit out of context here so I'll cut our hero a little slack - but just in case AjLal is not that clued up about these things I'll explain it for him. RISK AND REWARD OLD MAN, CAPITALISM IS ALL ABOUT RISK AND REWARD.
I've blogged about the SAB deal before
SAB is a fascinating deal, it stands out as the only one where the business reasons are so apparent. We know that the Western Cape is clamping down on unlicensed taverns and 70% of SAB's turnover comes from unlicensed taverns. Here is SAB staring at the potential demise of their biggest channel unless they do something. Sheer brilliance, if I may use such a superlative.
And I still think it's the best deal done so far, in spite of what Fawu says. Let them strike I say - just make sure that you suck on Windhoek Lager at the end of the day of hard toyi-toying.