« Robin Woolley - A summary of the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Amendment Bill 2011 | Main | The horse's mouth - rumours about new codes continue. »

January 26, 2012

Comments

Tony

Good interpretation. Agreed and makes sense. On another point does a strict reading of 3.2.1 therefore mean (in yr opinion) that contributions must strictly be made on an annual basis and that they cannot be held over until the next period. I'm particularly thinking about business loans as per the matrix where the outstanding loan amount is considered to be the ED contibution. A strict reading seems to suggest that any contribution must be made annually and that any "old" contributions will fall away. Any thoughts??

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Blog powered by Typepad

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

June 2024

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30            

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter